I think I’d heard a while back that they were working on a new Terminator movie, but when the trailer for Terminator: Genisys (ugh, that Y—and the I, but mostly the Y!) debuted a couple of weeks ago, it took me by surprise. I thought the 4th Terminator film was just awful on a number of levels—it’s not part of my own “head-canon” for the series—so I suppose when I first heard about a T5, I just cringed and then pushed it from my mind.
And yet, after seeing the trailer, I can’t deny that I’m intrigued. Terminator: Genisys might actually have some potential (except that Y). I’ve been meaning to blog my thoughts on the trailer for a while, but with the Percy Jackson reading and other responsibilities, this is the first time I’ve had a chance.
First, some of the images from the trayler. Click for larger versions…
While watching for the first time, the color scheme was nice to see. One thing that bothered me about T4 was its many daytime scenes, when we’d only seen darkness in previous flash-forwards. Sure, daylight would still exist in the future, but it didn’t feel, thematically, a part of the same franchise. Even so, despite the palette, at this point in the trailer was I still only watching with half interest, expecting disappointment.
He doesn’t look like any of the myriad of John Connor’s we’ve ever seen, but John has been played by so many actors over the years that I don’t particularly mind. Still, just feeling indifferent as I watched…
My interest pricked up a little bit when it seemed the movie would be showing us the capture of the time machine and how things unfolded at that point in terms of discovering what Skynet had done and deciding what to do about it. I’ve always wanted to see this, and was disappointed T4 didn’t give it to me. Sure, we know the outcome, but did they discover one terminator had been sent back, decided to send Reese, and then discovered that Skynet had tried again with the T-1000 because sending Reese changed their own past? (And then of course there’s the reprogramming of the second T-800, the T-X, and the T-850…) There are a number of ways it could have gone. So I got more curious. At the same time, though, I was still skeptical: what if they don’t put any thought into that?
Up to this point, though, I figured the movie would mostly take place in the future. (So maybe we still won’t even see them learning about the T-1000?) But then Reese gets sent back…
And then a van smashes through the windows of the department store, hitting the cop going after Reese and…
Aaaand that’s where I became intrigued. SOMEthing clearly got messed around with the timeline. Exactly what happened? Why? The Terminator series, especially with the first two films, has always had the potential for mind-screwing time-travel lurking beneath (and sometimes above) the surface. John wouldn’t be born if he hadn’t sent Reese back to become his father. (Was Reese always his father, or did that change the future so things became a little different?) If Skynet was never built, then how did the terminators/Reese get sent back to ensure that Skynet never existed? Are they from alternate timelines, or did they just become disconnected from their source in the timestream? Ontological paradoxes!
That sort of thing can be absolutely fantastic in science fiction, but only if the writers take pains to be consistent in how things are handled. Will the writers be thinking “4th-dimentionally,” or will it just be a case of slipshod, “we want to do THIS now and we can because TIME TRAVEL and bloobitty-blobbity-bloop-EXPLOSIONS!” I mean, I’m paraphrasing, but you get my point.
Yeah, I’m a nerd. Wanna fight about it?
So I wanted to know more. My hopes were raised. This might actually be good, if they can pull it off in a smart way. I kept watching.
I actually didn’t think of the shotgun thing until later. And maybe he’ll shoot him a few times to distract him and then just tear his head off. Hey, does this mean Bill Paxton doesn’t die? Think he’ll have a cameo?
So, somehow, a T-800 was sent back to Sarah’s childhood. Does that double as a way to explain Arnold’s age? Does the exterior skin on the chassis age? I suppose I’m good with that. What keeps that stuff alive, anyway? Does a terminator need to eat? Does he steal Robocop’s baby food? Does he have to moisturize?
Here are some tidbits from the rest of the trailer…
So as you can probably tell, I’m cautiously, trepidatiously optimistic. It’s entirely possible that they’ll crash and burn on this, but maybe, just maybe, they’ll get it right. I hear they’re trying to “reset” the franchise with this, so if it works, there will likely be more. Where they’d go from there, I don’t really know. Would there be anywhere to go if they DID succeed in stopping Skynet from existing? Or would they just pull what Terminator 3 did and say, “Yeah, still happened. Explosions!”
(Okay, so I liked some of Terminator 3. It had some interesting ideas. Worlds better than T4. But still…)
Interesting. I agree that this could be very good, or very very bad. But I am moderately curious (which is more than I can say about the new Star Wars).
Michael G. Munz says
No curiosity at all about The Force Awakens, Tomandtish? I’m still not sure if it’ll be good or disappointing, but I am at least curious to find out.
Dee Lancaster says
I’m intrigued by the trailer. I’m not such a terminater fan because of the time travel idiosyncrasies but this movie looks fun, even as a stand alone. Sometimes, after 30 years, I like to just take a movie as a stand alone even if it’s part of a franchise. I love your trailer review. Do terminators need to eat?
Bethany House says
The trailer does intrigue me, but I’ve only ever watched T2 (I was told not to bother with the others). I plan on watching this movie, though that’s just because Jai Courtney is in it (Loved him in A Good Day to Die Hard). Pondering watching the other Terminator movies to catch up on the story, but also think it would be fun to go in having no idea about most of it.
Michael G. Munz says
Whoever told you not to bother with the original movie did you a disservice if you like sci-fi at all. I recommend giving it a look! It’s got Michael Biehn, after all.
I am also cautiously optimistic about this movie. I haven’t seen the 4th one because, well, it doesn’t look particularly good. This one on the other hand looks like it will be pretty good. Fingers crossed.
Michael G. Munz says
Good call on the 4th one. I remember little at this point, save for a bunch of terminators who are REALLY bad at their jobs being unable to kill simple squishy humans when they’ve got their hydraulic hands around said humans’ necks.
cary david hoffson says
skynet wants them so bad this time he send more then one and some how john knows so he did the samething as skynet now with 1984 because they unable to kill each time and hope this time they can kill skynet by doing that with help of more time machines they have now